Forum

Banneling

JJ Johnson

zei op zaterdag 5 december 2020 - 22:18

Dear all,

The third or fourth entry from the top, beginning with Jacob van Oudendijck, is from a criminal verdict regarding him and his wife. What does it say/transcription? With many thanks in advance! 

Reacties (2)

René van Weeren zei op za, 12/05/2020 - 23:44

It concerns a banishment because of severe (however, undisclosed) reasons.

 

Jacob Floris Oudendijck en[de] Sara Baersenburgh
sijn omme gewichtige redenen haer [doorgehaalde tekst] daer toe
moverende de stadt en[de] vrijheyt vandien ontseyt.
Gedaen den 28[en] januarii 1664

 

Jacob Floris Oudendijck and Sara Baersenburgh
have been denied, because of important reasons leading the city government to this decision,
access to the city and its surrounding jurisdiction.
Decision has been made on the 28th of January 1664

JJ Johnson zei op zo, 12/06/2020 - 00:06

Thank you very much René van Weeren! I have searched for more docs, to no avail. Wonder what they did. 

Reageer op dit bericht

Over tekstopmaak
De inhoud van dit veld is privé en zal niet openbaar worden gemaakt.
Slechts één bestand.
10 MB limiet.
Toegestane types: png gif jpg jpeg.
Opmerking