This is the deed that followed on from the last one I posted.
I think it's also from November 1663 and included Willem Teylingen and his wife Appolina.
What may be of relevance (I'm not sure) is that in the 'Population register' from Delft in 1663 there's a record of Willem Teylingen being recorded with place of origin stated as Batavia. Does that mean he was born there or simply traveled from there to Delft?
with much thanks as always
Anne
Op huyden den 27 November XVLC dryensestich
compareerden voor mijn Dirck Rees, notaris publick,
bij den Hove van Hollant geadmitteert, residerende
binnen der stadt Delf, ter presentie van de
naerbeschreven getuygen, den eersame Willem
Jaspers van Teylinge ende d'eerbare Applonia
Abrahams Scheurwater, geëchte luyden, mij notaris
bekent, beyde cloeck ende gesont van lichame, gaende
ende staende, haer verstant seer wel ende volcomentlijck
gebruyckende, als opentlijck bleeck, disponeerende
op de voochdije over de onmondige kint of
kinderen, die den eerstervende van hen beyden naer-
laten sal, ende hebben daerover gestelt, sulcx sij
stellen bij deesen, de langstlevende van hen beyden
ende neffens deselve Annitge Jacobs, sijn comparants
moeder ende Abraham Jacobsz Scheurwater, haer
comparants vader, ende bij overlijden van een of meer van hen-
luyden sal of sullen de langstlevende vermogen ende
gehouden weesen een ander bequaem ende gequalificeert
persoon of personen in des afgestorvens plaets te verkiesen
geduyrende successivelijck tot de mondicheyt van hare
comparants onmonidge kint of kinderen, gevende
deselve gestelde ende te verkiesen voochden sodanige
macht, last, authoriteyt ende bevel als eenige testament-
taire voochden en voochdessen naer rechten comt, aythori-
seerden deselve mede omme de goederen van de onmondige
kint of kinderen te mogen verhuren ende te vercoopen,
t'sij int openbaer of onder de hant, ende ten behouve van de /
copers van de onroerende goederen te doen
wettige ende behoorlicke opdrachte sonder eenige
nadere authorisatie, t'sij van den Hove van Hollant,
gerechten, weescameren, naaste vryenden of yemant
anders daertoe te behouven, met uytsluytinge
van allen andren ende ende van de weescamer deser
stadt ende alle andre weescamenren, schouten ende gerech-
ten, niettegenstaende eenige placaten,
keuren, ordonantien ofte andre acten ter contrarie,
alle hetwelcke sij comparanten verclaerden te weesen
haer uyterste wille ende laeste begeert, t'welck
sij wilden ende begeerden dat volcomentlijck sal werden
naergecomen, cracht hebben ende effect sorteren
sal, t'sij als codicil of soo alle t'selve naer rechten of
goedertieren gewoonte best mach bestaen,
al waer't dat alle solemnityetyen na rechten van
nooden in desen niet onderhouden bevonden mochten sijn,
versoeckende hyervan acte gemaeckt ende gelevert
te werden in forma. Aldus verleden ende gepasseert
binnen der stadt Delf, ten comtoire mijns notaris, in
presentie van Georgius van Bockhoven ende
Jacobus van der Maes, als getugen hier-
toe versocht ende gebeden.
G. v. Bockhoven
W. v. Teylingen
Aplonia Aberhams
Yacobis Tielmanse van der Maes
Dirck Rees, notaris, 1663
Great as always Geert :-)
I've never seen this before -that the husband and wife each appoint one of their parents to help manage their affairs if one of them should die.
Does this suggest they had a very big 'estate' that would take some managing after one of them was deceased?
warmest (today in fact very warmest!) best wishes
Anne
That's nothing special. This often occurs in notarial deeds. It is not an indication of wealth or anything like that.
Dear Anne, you might notice here as a familiar disposition the exclusion of the powers/role of a weeskamer (orphan chamber) because the couple stipulated its arrangements for any surviving minor children already here. A lot of matters concerning various forms of regular notarial acts from the seventeenth and eighteenth are discussed by the late A.F. Gehlen, Notariële akten uit de 17e en 18e eeuw : handleiding voor gebruikers (Zutphen 1986) as commentaries to his transcriptions of examples of such acts. For its project at the Vele Handen indexing and transcribing platform Het Utrechts Archief created a fine concise guide to several types of acts, see https://velehanden.nl/Inhoud/bestanden/index/name/Handleiding+aktetypen… . The clue for establishing the type of a notarial act in this period is recognizing the main verb used by the notary, often a verb with a Latin root.
I obviously haven't read as many wills as you have Geert- this was a first for me!
Thanks for the link and tip Otto, I'll have a look at that too.
very best wishes to you both.
Anne
Anne
zei op dinsdag 11 augustus 2026 - 22:34